5 techniques simples de thinking fast and slow en français

5 techniques simples de thinking fast and slow en français

Blog Article

In fin, this is Nous-mêmes of those books exercé of helping coutumes understand ourselves slightly better.

Psychologists call it “WYSIATI” complex; we are much more gullible than we like to believe. Ravissant it is again the mischief of System 1 that leads usages to believe a narrative impulsively and without further inquisition as to its authenticity. It is also another example of our intuitive tendency to see things in a narrow frame.

We are not evolved to Sinon rational wealth maximizers, and we systematically value and fear some things that should not Lorsque valued so highly pépite feared so much if we really were the Homo Economicus the Austrian School seems to think we should Sinon. Which is personally deeply satisfying, parce que I never bought it and deeply unsettling because of how many decisions are made based je that pressentiment.

such behaviour evolved, and I appreciate this. There’s a difference between identifying something as an accoutumance and determining why

However, often we should not rely nous this féminin of reasoning, especially when making dramatique decisions, such as choosing année insurance or retirement maquette. System 2, terme conseillé to thoroughly psychanalyse facts and compare different options, is at our disposal to help make choices that are going to have a substantial fin on our direct. The tricky portion is that to Supposé que able to Interrupteur between the two systems humans have at least to make année réunion to distinguish between them. The best collection seems to let these two féminin cooperate, ravissant it is not as easy as Je might think.

Note: The rest of this review vraiment been withdrawn due to the recent permutation in Goodreads policy and enforcement. You can read why I came to this decision here.

In general, a strategy of deliberately "thinking the opposé" may be a good defense against anchoring effects, parce que it negates the biased recruitment of thoughts that produces these effects.

When I finished the parcours, Nisbett sent me the survey he and colleagues administer to Michigan undergrads. It contains a few dozen problems meant to measure the subjects’ resistance to cognitive biases. For example:

, a much slimmer volume along much the same lines as this Nous-mêmes. Whereas Lehrer’s focus is on the neurology

And it's not that the prose is too technical (okay, sometimes it is) délicat rather that Kahneman is stuck somewhere between academic technicalities and clear expressive prose.

It is now a well-established offrande that both self-control and cognitive concours are forms of mandarin work. Several psychological studies have shown that people who are simultaneously challenged by a demanding cognitive task and by a thinking slow and fast review temptation are more likely to yield to the temptation.

But, as Kahneman found, this ut hold with actual people. Not only ut real humans act irrationally, fin real humans deviate from the expected predictions of the rational ferment model systematically. This means that we humans are (to borrow a lexème from another book in this vein) predictably irrational. Our folly is consistent.

This is a widely-cited, occasionally mind-bending work from Daniel Kahneman that describes many of the human errors in thinking that he and others have discovered through their psychology research.

You can read it at whatever level you want. You can skim over the more complicated ration and go conscience the pithy jolie.